19 Is Integrating Images into Digital Writing Important? – Kimberly Wagers
Kimberly Kirkman Wagers is a fourth-year student majoring in Technical and Professional Writing. She grew up in Oolitic, Indiana. This is a research infographic that she wrote for ENG W323 Digital Writing in Fall 2021. Kimberly’s professor Tanya Perkins remarked, “It is rare that I have a student who is willing to work as diligently and industriously on a project as Kim did on her literature review. She spent many more hours than required ensuring that her research project was well-designed and met assignment goals and that the accompanying literature review was clear and complete. She did all this while running her own daycare business!”
Is Integrating Images into Digital Writing Important?
Inserting images into digital documents is crucial. It is a great way to convey your message quickly to an audience without the users having to drudge through mounds of text. Images are also easily shared, making this accessible to even more viewers. Imagery works so well in conveying messages because the brain works in images; it’s the most natural way for the brain to process information. Because of this, images are quickly processed, easily remembered, and easily recalled.
In today’s world, users scan, not read. According to a 2020 Nielsen survey, people still scan rather than read even though there have been new layouts, new patterns, etc., from 2006 to 2019. And nearly all gaze patterns have remained the same (Moran, 2020). Most of this is because humans are visual creatures and digest the most meaningful information using our sight (McCue, 2013). Individuals use both hearing and visuals to communicate, but the visual aspect of the two makes it memorable (Parker, 1995, p. 32).
With the ongoing increase in technology, Schnell (2006) predicts that “life will become more and more of a visual experience. Sight, as one of the human senses, will have dominance over the other senses” (p. 58). Images do what no other can do. For almost every word spoken, a visual comes to mind, thus allowing us to communicate more by using images than text – hence, indeed, a picture is worth a thousand words (Horton, 1993, p. 495). Through visuals, one can do the impossible, “show the unshowable” (Horton, 1993, p. 499).
One often hears the phrase that a picture is worth a thousand words. So, why not use an image instead of a thousand words? When educators Anne Hibbing and Joan Rankin-Erickson interviewed Pound Middle School students who struggle with reading and comprehension, the students said the following:
“A picture helps me by showing what’s going on.”
“Pictures…helps me see what they are talking about.”
“If you look at a picture, it puts more ideas in your head.”
Those working with struggling readers found that pictures/visuals are invaluable for communicating a message (Hibbing, 2003, p. 758). Images can also help break communication barriers if used wisely. Graphics can now be turned to as a universal language. According to Horton (1993), “By relying on images shared by all and by avoiding details that confuse or offend, we can make graphics independent of verbal language and of culture” (p. 682). This is great news for English language learners or people with specific disabilities – helping to bring about social equity. For those who have language barriers to English, visuals communicate much better.
It is also essential to understand how images and text work together to create meaning, know when images enhance or detract from a text, and build strong viewer involvement (Harrison, 2003, p. 47). Harrison goes on to say that “The image plus text create a strong rhetorical unit” (56). The goal of digital writing is to use a level of multimodal writing that allows for more depth in reader understanding, more efficient consumption, and easier access for different learning styles, and makes it easier to judge the credibility of information. Especially in a world that scans, not reads – this is the best way to gain their attention and to keep it. So, yes, integrating images into digital writing is vital.
References
Harrison, C. (2003). Visual social semiotics: Understanding how still images make meaning. Technical Communication, 50(1), 46–60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43090531
Hibbing, A. N., & Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand words: Using visual images to improve comprehension for middle school struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 56(8), 758–770. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20205292
Horton, W. (1993). The almost universal language: Graphics for international documents. Technical Communication, 40(4), 682–693. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43090219
Horton, W. (1993). Visual literacy: Going beyond words in technical communications. Technical Communication, 40(3), 495–499. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43091030
McCue, T. (2013, January 8). Why infographics rule. Forbes. Retrieved November 14, 2021, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/tjmccue/2013/01/08/what-is-an-infographic-and-ways-to-make-it-go-viral/?sh=6a64974e7272
Moran, K. (2020, April 5). How people read online: New and old findings. NN/g Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved November 14, 2021, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-people-read-online/
Parker, R. (1995). The ten commandments for presentation visuals. NACTA Journal, 39(2), 32–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43765455
Schnell, J. (2006). The increased emphasis on visual imagery, versus aural messages, and related ramifications. Visual Arts Research, 32(2), 56–58. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20715420