4 Integrals
Simply put an integral generates the area under a curve on the interval . There are many different ways to calculate the area under a curve. Examples include right, left, and mid-point approximations. Using the area of smaller rectangles to roughly summarize the total area underneath the curve for to either by left, right, or mid-hand points, this type of approximation is known as Riemann sums. The fault of this kind of calculation is that it requires to be continuous and non-negative [35]. This is where definite integrals have the upper hand, need not be continuous and non-negative in order for integration to be able to calculate the area under the curve for . The formal definition is as follows [35].
Definition.
Given is a function defined on the interval , then the definite integral of from to is denoted by
In the following graph we are given the line for the function . On the interval from (2,4) we have a shaded region between the curve and the x-axis. This shaded region is what we are solving for when we evaluate an integral.
Given this formal definition we can now introduce the Mean Value theorem [35].
Theorem: The Mean Value Theorem
If is continuous on the interval , then there is a such that
The objective of an integral is to anti-differentiate and solve for the function an interval . This is part one of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus [35].
Theorem: Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 1
If is a continuous function on , then the function is defined by
, such that on .
Consider an example involving this theorem.
Example:
Given the integral , by the fundamental theorem of calculus .
The second part of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus gives the formal definition for finding the area of a region with only the end points of the interval [35].
Theorem: Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 2
If is continuous on the interval and is the anti-derivative of , then
This may be considered one of the most important theorems in mathematics, as it allows us to quantify areas that may take many humans lifetimes to calculate if at all possible.
We will now proceed to the rules of integration, it should be noted that these rules bare many similarities to the rules given for differentiation. We begin with some of the most common integrals. As well, the constant added to every integration solution is the unknown constant of the anti-derivative that needs to be considered because when , containing constant , is differentiated per the constant rule.
Constants
Let where is a constant. The integral for is written as
Given the rule of constants under integration [37], we see we are, in a way, undoing the work of differentiation. Just as we took the derivative of to find . Under the constant rule for integration if then , for .
Variables
Consider , by the integration of variables
Under the rule for variables [37], we are essentially reversing the work of derivatives. This rule stands as a definition for the behavior of a variable as it undergoes integral evaluation. The next few rules are more definitions for the behavior of variables under different operations.
Reciprocals
Let , then we write the integral as
Here we can see that if we have a function that bares strong resemblance to , or a function that can be simplified to the format, then we can apply the reciprocal rule to evaluate the integral [37]. To best understand this law we can look at an example.
Example:
Given , evaluate the integral for .
Per the Rule for reciprocals we start with the following integral and then move to simplify the integral by moving the outside of the integral.
Now, we can move to integrate using our rule of reciprocals.
Thus we can see how a function of this format behaves under integration.
Exponents
Let , .
Now if we had a constant such that then we can integrate as follows [37].
What we see from this integration that, just as the derivative of resulted in the antiderivative is thus . The only exception is when there is a operations on . If has been multiplied by a constant or hase been put to the power of some then we must integrate the exponent as though we were taking the antiderivative with respect to x, utilizing integration behavior of the operations on .
The Power Rule
Let for , by the power rule [37]
Again, the rules are meant to provide structure for how functions of a defined format are to behave under integration. The power rule provides an axiom for how a function with exponent will perform under integration.
The Constant Rule
Let be a constant then the integral for is as follows [37]:
As we can see from this definition the constant rule shows us that a constant multiple is not affected by an integral, it can be extracted from the integral and then multiplied to the result of the integral. In many cases we use this rule as a step to simplify the integral before evaluating.
The Sum Rule
Consider and , by the sum rule for integration [37]. The integral of is
Just as we differentiated functions independently of one another when they were brought together under addition, the same is true for integration. There is nothing fancy about the integration of a function , with multiple functions added together, to create . Thus when we integrate we can do so in one or separately but the results will be equal to one another.
The Difference Rule
Again consider the functions and , by the difference rule [37] the integral for is
As we mentioned in the sum rule for integration the same can be said for the difference rule. If we have a function , made up of the difference between smaller functions, then we can either integrate under one integral or we can separate them as a way to simplify the integration. Either way the result will be the same.
Integration by Parts
We will briefly cover integration by parts [35] here as an introduction but will delve deeper in a later section. Integration by parts is utilized when contains two functions multiplied together. Let and be independent functions such that
Integration by parts is vastly more complex than the basic rules we have covered thus far. This integration method utilizes the integration rules listed previously depending on the variables and . In mathematics, many times we are required to recognize the format of various functions in order to distinguish which method we will be applying to integrate the function. Integration by parts is also unique in that it, at times, my require many rounds of integration depending on the structure of and whether it can easily by integrated or if another integration by parts is necessary. Another form of integration, when a function may seem complex enough that it might take hours to properly integrate, is by substitution.
Integration by Substitution
There are cases where finding the anti-derivative of a function is very complex, this is where substitution comes in. Let such that is continuous on the interval , let be continuous over the range of with [35]. Then
To better explain the process of integration by substitution we are given the following steps to solve the integral [35].
- Select the expression such that and find .
- Now substitute and into the integral for and , respectively.
- Evaluate the integral with respect to .
- Once the integral has been evaluated rewrite the solution in terms of by substituting back in for .
We will continue the discussion of integration by substitution in regards to trigonometric functions later on in this section.
4.1 Integration by Parts
For every derivative there is an anti-derivative and as such there needs to be a method of integration to anti-differentiate a derivative found by the product rule of differentiation. This is where integration by parts can be introduced. The formal definition was given in the previous section as
Breaking this definition down, if we consider a function , by the product rule of differentiation, [35]. We now need to anti-differentiate with respect to . Using integration by parts we have
Here we can actually apply the sum rule for integration
Now given that integration is finding the anti derivative we can set the integral equal to and solve for [35].
Now, if we replace and with and respectively we get our formal definition.
Let us consider some examples of this technique in application.
Example:
Consider the integral let and such that . By integration by parts we can rewrite the integral and solve.
Thus by integration by parts we have found .
4.2 Trigonometric Substitution
We briefly introduced substitution in a previous section but will now continue with substitution with trigonometric functions. It is vital to know how to use trigonometric functions to substitute for expressions when integrating certain functions. Knowing the following substitutions and how to evaluate them will make integrating complex expressions involving the roots of quadratics far easier. Consider the three important trigonometric substitutions for integration [35].
- Consider the expression , then we let such that
- Consider the expression , then we let such that
- Consider the expression , then we let such that
Let us now visit an example to show how trigonometric substitution is applied and follows through after evaluation.
Example:
Given the integral
We instantly see from the expression in the denominator that such that and . Let us now substitute these new found expressions back into the integral and evaluate.
Now that we have evaluated the integral we must convert the solution back into terms of . We know such that .
Consider a triangle then, with opposite side to the hypotenuse as and adjacent side to the hypotenuse as , then the hypotenuse is .
Let be equivalent to the opposite side over the hypotenuse resulting in . Then substitute this expression of for and simplify.
Thus we have found through trigonometric substitution that
The following video offers a deeper look at integration by parts and trigonometric substitution, two of the more challenging integration methods. At the end of the video we will also be introduced to a real world application of integration.