6 Sequences

Abbott provides us with the following definition for a sequence [1].


Definition I.12
A sequence is a function whose domain is \mathbb{N}.

So, a sequence \{a_n\} defined by a function f(n) is really just a number pattern where f(n) is the nth term a_n in the pattern. In calculus, we are interested in whether the sequence converges or diverges (does not converge).

One way to find whether a sequence \{a_n\} defined by f(n) converges is to find

    \[\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}f(n).\]

If this limit exists, then the sequence not only converges but converges to that limit [15].

We also have a theorem that can be used to determine if a sequence converges when it is hard to find the limit or to know if it even exists. The theorem is stated by Larson and Edwards as follows [15].

Theorem I.13

If a sequence {a_n} is bounded and monotonic, then it converges.

This theorem raises an important question. What do bounded and monotonic mean?

A sequence is bounded above when a_n is less than or equal to a real number M for all n and bounded below when a_n is greater than or equal to M for all n. A sequence is bounded when it is bounded above and below [15].

Monotonic means that either

    \[a_n\leq a_{n+1}\,\,\text{or}\,\, a_n\geq a_{n+1}\]

for all n [15]. That is, the sequence is either nondecreasing or nonincreasing.

We will not go through a formal proof here, but we will discuss why this theorem makes sense. Consider a nondecreasing, bounded sequence \{a_n\}. That is,

    \[a_1\leq a_2\leq ...\leq M\]

where M is a real number. Every sequence must either converge or diverge, and a nondecreasing sequence diverges if and only if for every real number x we can find n such that a_n\geq x. Because there exists a real number x such that a_n\leq M< x for all n, \{a_n\} does not diverge and must converge. Thus, if a sequence is nondecreasing and bounded, it must converge. Similar reasoning can be used for a nonincreasing, bounded sequence.

Let’s now look at a problem that demonstrates how to prove a sequence is monotone and bounded so that the theorem can be applied. This is a problem I completed for Calculus II and comes from Larson and Edwards [15].


Example 14
Does a_n=\displaystyle\frac{5}{n}+8 converge?

Solution
The terms of \{a_n\} are

    \[13,\frac{21}{2},\frac{29}{3},....\]

The terms appear to be decreasing but will the sequence continue this way? Because n is positive, we have that for all n

    \begin{align*} \frac{1}{n}&>\frac{1}{n+1} \\ \frac{5}{n}+8 &> \frac{5}{n+1}+8 &&\text{Multiply by 5 and add 8}\\ a_n&>a_{n+1} \end{align*}

Thus, a_n is decreasing and consequently monotonic. Moreover, a_n is bounded above by 13.

Now, we need to determine if a_n is bounded below. Because n is a natural number, we have

    \begin{align*} \frac{1}{n}&\geq0 \\ \frac{5}{n}+8 &\geq 8 &&\text{Multiply by 5 and add 8}\\ \end{align*}

Thus, a_n is bounded below by 8. By Theorem I.13, a_n converges.

We are now going to begin our discussion of series, which builds upon the ideas of sequences.

License

Portfolio for Bachelor of Science in Mathematics Copyright © by Abigail E. Huettig. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book