13 Set Theory
Set theory is the study of sets (or collections) of numbers. Some common examples of sets in set theory would be the natural numbers, whole numbers, integers, rationals, irrationals, and reals. These are denoted as and
respectively. There is an infinite number of possibilities for sets as they are just a collection of numbers and can include anywhere from zero to an infinite number of elements.
Terminology
Before we can go any further, we must have a good understanding of some basic terminology. If is in a set
, denoted
, then we call
an element of
. The set that has zero elements is called the empty or null set and is denoted as
[23]. A set
is a subset of a set
, denoted
, if every element that is in
is also in
.
is a proper subset of
, denoted
, if every element in
is also in
and there is at least one element in
that is not in
. In other words,
is a subset of but is not equal to
.
and
are disjoint sets when they do not have any common elements. That is, for every
,
and for every
,
.
Operations
There are also operations that we can perform on sets. The union of sets and
, denoted as
, is the set of all elements in
and all elements in
. That is, if
, then
must be in either
or
. The intersection of sets
and
, denoted as
, is the set of all elements that
and
have in common. The difference of sets
and
, denoted
, is the set of all elements in
that are not in
. That is, if
, then
and
[23]. The complement of a set
, denoted
, is the set of all elements that are not in
. That is, if
, then
.
Now that we have covered the basic terminology and operations of sets, we are ready to discuss DeMorgan’s Laws and apply some of the concepts that we have just learned.
DeMorgan’s Laws for Sets
Recall that in chapter 10, we mentioned DeMorgan’s Laws as they applied to logic. Now, we are going to discuss DeMorgan’s Laws as they apply to set theory. Abbott provides us with the following theorem [1].
Theorem III.1 (DeMorgan’s Laws for Sets)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d03f0/d03f00cb6d2341c5fc1e009d10ffe445119a3afe" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com A"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5e03/f5e037f0134a188db413fdc85c0523ba5b837fd2" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com B"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9136a/9136aaa2aaeea329dadfb57b38589ebfd0e7f591" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \mathbb{R}"
In order to prove the first statement, we need to show that the two sets, and
, are equal. But how do we do that? In short, we prove that they are subsets of one another. If
, then every element in
must also be in
. But if
, then every element in
must also be in
. Since every element in
is also in
, we know that
contains all of the elements of
. We also know that there does not exist an element in
that is not in
. It follows then that
has the exact same elements as
. Thus,
. To prove that a set
is a subset of
, we show that if
is in
then
must also be in
.
We are now ready to prove the first of DeMorgan’s Laws. This is a homework problem I completed for Introduction to Analysis that comes from Abbott [1].
Show that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3eb9/d3eb9b4032b1e0d5721dfe8aea0d305d671cfcfd" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com (A \cap B)^c=A^c \cup B^c"
Proof.
If ,
and
by definition of intersection.
So, if ,
or
by definition of intersection and complement.
That is, or
by definition of complement.
Thus, by definition of union.
Therefore, .
If or
by definition of union.
That is, or
so
by definition of complement and intersection.
Thus, by definition of complement.
Therefore, .
Therefore, .
The proof of the second of DeMorgan’s Laws can be done in a similar manner. Having discussed the basics of set theory, we are going to dive into a more advanced topic, relations. We will see how different sets are connected and how they relate to one other.