Example Formal Report

Hilary Chaney and Yu Kay Law

This is a formal report that was written by Hilary Chaney and edited.  It should give you a sense of what is expected in a formal report.  For this class, there are no specific formatting requirements either for the paper itself or citations, provided that they are understandable and self-consistent within the report.


Measuring the Density of Water Using Different Glassware

Abstract

Different types of glassware is widely used to measure the volume of liquid samples, of which aqueous solutions are commonly studied. In this experiment, we evaluate the accuracy of various types of volumetric glassware by measuring the mass of water delivered by each type of glassware and comparing this with the known density of water. Based on the results, we found that the accuracy of a buret is greater than that of a graduated cylinder, which is more accurate than using the graduations on a beaker. This information can be used to help select glassware for future experiments.

Introduction

In chemistry, many reactions occur with reactants and/or products in aqueous solutions or in other solvents. At other times, reactions take place involving reactants in the liquid phase are found. When studying these samples, often it is important that measurements of volume are completed as accurately as possible.

To determine the accuracy – the extent to which the measured quantity matches the true quantity – we need to be able to compare measurements made using this equipment with those made using a standard. Since standard, reproducible volumes of liquids are difficult to obtain, we instead determine the density of a known liquid using both the glassware and a common balance, and compare the densities measured with the published density for this liquid.

The density of a substance is defined as

[latex]\text{density} = \frac{\text{mass}}{\text{volume}}[/latex]

which can be measured for a given sample by measuring both its mass and volume. In this experiment, we measure the mass of a measured volume of deionized water delivered into a beaker using various pieces of glassware with a balance. The resulting density measurements were compared with density values reported by Wentworth and Munk (1).

Methods

Known volumes of deionized water was measured using (in turn) a beaker, a graduated cylinder and a buret. A digital balance was used to determine the mass of each sample of water. As the number of significant figures reported on the digital balance significantly exceeds the number of significant figures reported for the volume of the water, the number of significant figures associated with the volume measurement determines the number of significant figures reported for the measurement.

A digital thermometer was used to determine the temperature of the deionized water with which the known density can be obtained from ref (1).

Results

The density of water measured using the three devices are listed in Table 1 below, along with the percent error for the density of water compared to the published value. The beaker is the least accurate measuring device, while the buret is the most accurate measuring device. This can be deduced based on the decreasing percent error for more accurate glassware.  The reported density of water at this temperature is 0.9980 g/mL

Table 1: Density of Water Measured Using Different Devices

Measuring Device Measured density (g/mL) Percent error (%)
100 mL beaker 1.2 20
100 mL graduated cylinder 0.968 3.1
Volumetric buret 1.001 0.30

Discussion

The results show that while a reasonable level of accuracy expected for most experimental purposes can be obtained using a volumetric buret for quantitative applications, and for most qualitative and semi-quantitative purposes (such as preparing reaction mixtures) by using a graduated cylinder. However, the beaker provides only a rough estimate for the volume of water that is delivered. That said, since the time required to set up and perform the measurements increase as the accuracy increases, the less accurate pieces of glassware are still somewhat useful.

While this work provides evidence for the relative accuracy of different types of glassware, a number of questions remain. Firstly, while this conclusion is true for water, it is unclear whether this is also true for other liquids, given that the surface properties differ for different liquids (2). Therefore, the results of this study are probably limited to dilute aqueous solutions. Another significant limitation of this work is that only one trial was conducted for each piece of glassware. Therefore, it is not possible for the precision of this glassware to be evaluated based on the results of this experiment alone.

Conclusion

Of the pieces of glassware evaluated in this experiment, the 100 mL beaker is the least accurate for determining the volume of water, while the buret is the most accurate. This experiment can be extended further by repeating the experiment using the same glassware to evaluate the precision of the glassware, as well as to evaluate the efficacy of this glassware to measure liquids other than water by determining the density of other reagents using the same methods.

Bibliography

  1. Wentworth, R. A. D. and Munk, B. H. Experiments in General Chemistry: Laboratory Manual, 10th Ed.; Brooks/Cole: Belmont, CA, 2013.
  2. Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E., Bursten, B. E., Murphy, C. J. and Woodward, P. M. Chemistry – The Central Science, 12th Ed,; Prentice Hall: Boston, MA, 2012.

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

IU East Experimental Chemistry Laboratory Manual Copyright © 2022 by Hilary Chaney and Yu Kay Law is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book